fix bad credit florida roofing contractor buy dvd movies online dvds movies online credit report repair fast credit repair bad credit car loans bad credit car loan

Register/Login


Get Updates Via Email






 Subscribe in a reader

Fight AntiSpam

Anti Spam Honeypot

Other Contributors

Srini Uppala
Want to contribute?

Hit Counter



Bookmarks

RSS Feeds


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Add to Technorati Favorites
desi Blogs
View Pradeep Sadanapalli's profile on LinkedIn
Who links to me?

Sign My Guestbook

Sign my Guestbook from Bravenet.com 

« CM wants expressway at express speed | Home | 10 things you can expect in 2008 »

AP gets back Gurukul land

Posted by Srini Uppala | December 31, 2007 | 810 views

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Monday upheld the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Laws (amendment Act 28 of 2002) Act. This will enable the state government to retain the Gurukul Ghatkesar Trust land surrounding Hitec City, which it took over from encroachers.

The land belonged to one Bhadrinath earlier and he reportedly handed it over to the Trust in 1951 through a gift deed. The Trust holds about 640 acres in Izzatnagar of Khanamet village.

Prominent persons including film actors and politicians had constructed houses in the land, which has been in the centre of a controversy for the last two decades. Certain software companies also purchased plots there and trustees allegedly sold some plots to private societies in 1982. The endowments department took over the responsibility of running the Trust after trustees fought with each other few years ago.

A division bench comprising acting Chief Justice Bilal Nazki and Justice N. Ram Mohan Rao on Monday dismissed a writ petition filed by Gangula Narsimha and 32 others claiming to be the protected tenants of the land in Khanamet village. The petitioners urged the court to say that the provision of Clause (g) of Section 102 of AP (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agriculture Act was unconstitutional.

According to them, the Trust had no right to claim ownership of the land. However, the endowments department told the court that the land originally belonged to the Trust. Ch. Satish Kumar, standing counsel for the endowments department, said the court order would allow the government to take over land which was encroached upon. He added that the petitioners were trying to taking shelter under the provisions of the AP Charitable Institutions and Endowments Act.

SOURCES:
Deccan Chronicle

Topics: Property Matters, Govt In Action, Real Estate |

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.